Joan Didion and Eve Babitz: The sophisticated relationship between two very completely different literary ‘it women’theinsiderinsight

Joan Didion leans in opposition to her Corvette Stingray, a cigarette perched between her fingers. Her unsparing, unsmiling gaze appears to sear via the lens of photographer Julian Wasser’s digicam, and one arm – the one which isn’t connected to the cigarette – is folded throughout her waist like a defend. She seems standoffish, easy, cool. This black and white picture, captured for Time journal after the publication of Didion’s 1968 journalism assortment Slouching In the direction of Bethlehem, shortly turned a part of the author’s iconography. You should buy totes, prints and T-shirts emblazoned with it – significantly helpful if you wish to not-so-subtly proclaim your intellectual studying tastes and love of pared-back prose.

However 5 years earlier than Wasser captured this defining picture of Didion, he took one other, very completely different image, one which’s simply as hanging. In it, the 20-year-old Eve Babitz sits at a chessboard reverse the artist Marcel Duchamp, her face obliterated by a curtain of darkish hair. It’s the one factor about her that’s coated up: Babitz is totally bare, whereas Duchamp is totally dressed. These pictures seem to be polar opposites – and so, in some ways, have been Wasser’s topics, who chronicled the Los Angeles of the Sixties and Seventies in very other ways. The sophisticated dynamic between these someday mates is the topic of Lili Anolik’s dazzling new e-book Didion & Babitz.

What’s additionally fascinating is that, whether or not they did so knowingly or not, each writers – who died inside days of each other in December 2021 – set out the template for what it means to be a so-called literary “it lady”. As such, their picture and their phrases are actually usually co-opted as signifiers of literary cool. They’ve grow to be poster women for literature as way of life. Their quotes and black and white portraits seem on well-curated Instagram grids, and their stunning faces stare out from canvas luggage. However how did they get there, turning into “cultural heroines as a lot as literary [ones]”, as Anolik describes them to me?

Didion & Babitz traces the 2 ladies’s contrasting, typically overlapping profession trajectories. The previous’s extra easy ascent is a lot better recognized. Didion received a Vogue essay contest as a younger lady, then acquired a job composing photograph captions for the journal. Whereas she labored there, she wrote her first novel, Run, River. But it surely was Slouching In the direction of Bethlehem that made her a star. Her writing was clear and exact; her scrutiny of LA’s counterculture unflinching.

Didion’s fame soared additional with the discharge of The White Album, one other essay assortment, in 1979 – and in contrast to so many authors, her work by no means went out of vogue because the a long time modified. Then in her seventies, she received the Pulitzer Prize for The Yr of Magical Pondering, her transferring account of the aftermath of her husband John Gregory Dunne’s sudden loss of life. (Dunne was additionally her valued collaborator, modifying a lot of her work and co-writing screenplays together with her). The cult of Didion solely intensified as she acquired older. She modelled for the stylish, minimalist vogue model Céline in 2015; the identical 12 months, one other high-end label launched a $1,200 leather-based jacket with a drawing of her face emblazoned on the again. In 2017, she was the topic of a Netflix documentary, The Middle Will Not Maintain, directed by her nephew Griffin Dunne.

Babitz’s story is much extra chaotic and convoluted. She grew up in Hollywood in an arty milieu (the composer Igor Stravinsky was her godfather). Later, as Anolik sums it as much as me, she began “designing album covers” for bands equivalent to The Byrds and Buffalo Springfield, and “was the groupie supreme, and had a intercourse résumé that’s second to none”. She was linked to only about each edgy LA celeb of the period – Jim Morrison, Harrison Ford, Annie Leibovitz, Steve Martin. She inevitably drifted into the identical circles as Didion, who would later put in a very good phrase for her with an editor at Rolling Stone, offering Babitz’s writing profession with an preliminary shock of momentum. Her first e-book, 1974’s Eve’s Hollywood, is a heady evocation of life on the epicentre of the California scene, occupying a type of dreamy no man’s land between truth and fiction.

If Didion’s writing is stark, Babitz’s is sprawling; if Didion put Los Angeles below a essential microscope, Babitz considered it via a rose-tinted, sun-drenched, barely (OK, very) druggy haze. Certainly, within the identify drop-heavy dedication for Eve’s Hollywood, Babitz thanked the Didion-Dunnes for “having to be who I’m not”: “[Didion] and Eve have been type of opposites, who have been additionally doubles,” Anolik says. Gradual Days, Quick Firm, the essay assortment that Anolik sees each as Babitz’s masterpiece and an analogue to The White Album, adopted in 1977. So did novels equivalent to Intercourse & Rage and L.A. Lady and the story assortment Black Swans. (Is it any surprise that Babitz’s books now usually seem ever so casually in fashionable Instagram posts when the titles are this good?)

However her output and high quality could possibly be erratic, usually influenced by her drug use, in distinction to Didion’s regular craftswomanship. In 1997, she suffered extreme burns after by accident setting herself on hearth and retreated from public life. By the point that Anolik chanced upon Babitz’s identify in one other e-book and ordered a second-hand copy of Gradual Days, her works have been lengthy out of print. “I used to be simply certain that she was the key genius of Los Angeles,” Anolik says. She managed to trace Babitz down in LA; their prolonged conversations impressed a 2014 Self-importance Honest piece and a 2019 biography that helped reignite the studying public’s curiosity in each her glamorous life and her literary works, which have been finally reissued. A brand new technology of readers has since fallen for her breezy however acute insider’s perspective on a showbiz scene that appears a lot rawer and extra thrilling than immediately’s sanitised model.

open picture in gallery

Anolik had drawn a line below Babitz’s story – however then, after her loss of life, Babitz’s sister Mirandi found a field full of unsent letters and journals and alerted the creator. When she finally sifted via the contents, “my abdomen dropped to the ground”, Anolik says. The primary letter she pulled out was addressed to “Pricey Joan”. In it, Babitz appeared to upbraid her good friend and rival for refusing to learn Virginia Woolf – “I really feel as if you assume she’s a ‘lady’s novelist’ and that solely foggy brains might like her” – and concurrently adopting a defend of femininity, even frailty, when it suited her. “Might you write what you write in case you weren’t so tiny, Joan?” Babitz blazed. “Would you be allowed to in case you weren’t bodily so unthreatening?” (Didion’s writing is affected by references to bodily smallness, and she or he was all the time skinny, famously subsisting on almonds and chilled Weight-reduction plan Coke – in a society nonetheless obsessive about thinness, it’s onerous to divorce her dimension from her muse standing.)

Studying the letter, Anolik felt, was like “eavesdropping on a battle, a lovers’ quarrel. It [was] intensely private, and the feelings are so risky and passionate.” It’s as if Babitz has managed to see via Didion: the model, though there’s an irony to her criticising Didion for not sufficiently supporting ladies writers, given the way in which she’d initially championed Babitz’s profession. From different letters, Anolik additionally realized that Didion had briefly acted as editor on Eve’s Hollywood, one thing Babitz had by no means talked about in their very own conversations. “It wasn’t an overlooking, it was an obfuscation,” she says. “We had talked concerning the genesis of Eve’s Hollywood so many instances, and I had recognized that Joan acquired her into Rolling Stone, however this was at a completely completely different stage.” She was fascinated by the truth that “each ladies wrote the opposite out of historical past” – neither seems within the different’s writing a lot, even once they’re recounting social scenes that each have been a part of.

Anolik explores each writers’ personas – how they have been made, and the way they may have repelled and attracted each other. A part of what makes Didion & Babitz such an intriguing learn is the way in which that the creator makes use of Babitz – her letters, her story, her phrases – to light up and skewer the way in which that Didion fastidiously crafted her writerly picture. The lady effortlessly perching by the Corvette was something however.

“Didion writes in a confessional model, it’s lots of first-person journalism, however she’s actually an opaque character,” Anolik says. “She’s fairly guarded, fairly hidden, and any info you discover out about her, it’s info she desires you to learn about her. So she’s onerous to get inside. And Eve, in a completely completely different manner, was equally onerous to get inside. She appears open, and she or he’d reply your questions … [but] she can be violating her sense of favor, of who she was, if she complained.” Her letters and personal writings confirmed one other aspect to the Californian sunniness: her voice was “sharper, darker, extra devastated, much less informal”, Anolik places it in her e-book.

Through the years, veneration of Didion has solidified and sentimentalised (a course of helped alongside by the tote luggage and the Instagrammed quotes). “Individuals take her actually personally,” Anolik says, referring to the legions of followers who’ve adopted the author as a type of very fashionable secular saint. Utilizing Babitz as a prism permits Anolik to pierce that fame and present a distinct aspect to her. Typically Didion emerges as chilly and strategic. Anolik’s e-book, she provides, is “type of a ‘the way to information’, the way to grow to be Joan, [exploring] what it took to grow to be ‘Joan Didion’ and the worth she paid, and was prepared to pay … You don’t attain that stage with out being a really onerous driving, very tough-minded individual. She did have her heat moments, however to me, the work and being a terrific author is what meant probably the most to her.”

open picture in gallery

For Babitz, although, “considering when it comes to profession trajectory was antithetical to what she [was]. And that’s an artist, proper?” Anolik says. “She couldn’t bear to assume on this different manner. Joan actually was an artist, however Joan was so shrewd about considering in that manner.” So if Didion’s “it lady” model picture was deliberate, Babitz’s was haphazard, unintentional, belated (paradoxically, after all, that solely provides to its cool). In her preliminary Self-importance Honest piece, Anolik says, she “was capable of give [Eve] a persona which I don’t assume she bothered with on the time she was writing. She was residing this wild, glamorous, harmful, lustrous life that may be vastly interesting to individuals, however she in some way wasn’t publicising it”.

Anolik is ambivalent concerning the “literary it lady” label. On “some aesthetic stage”, she says, she objects: “it sounds weirdly sexist, pejorative to me.” And but, years of “taking a look at literary careers … from a long way” has proven her that “the writers that appear to have the most effective probabilities of survival [have to] write nice, however their persona needs to be actually thrilling to individuals not directly”. She factors to how F Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway (maybe America’s earliest “literary it boys”, not that they’d ever be known as such) “appeared like their very own characters, embodiments of the age and excesses wherein they have been residing… The work and the life [of the writer] simply blends… and that’s what individuals reply to.” We use these writers and their work as avatars of the lives we need to have: the impulse performs out many times, within the methods we’ve celebrated so-called “it women” as completely different as Nora Ephron, Zadie Smith and Sally Rooney.

Literary persona, then, may be “profound and necessary”. When Didion posed in entrance of the Corvette, she presaged her character Maria in her novel Play It As It Lays, who drove the identical automotive, had the identical model, identical perspective. And even when Babitz was a much less shrewd image-maker than her frenemy, she actually wrote variations of herself into her books because the perennial protagonist; Jacaranda in Intercourse & Rage is a barely disguised self-portrait, as is Sophie in L.A. Lady. “There’s this confluence of character, persona, author,” Anolik says. “All of it blends on this manner that captures individuals’s imaginations.” It’s this heady combine that makes these two antithetical, enigmatic pictures of Didion and Babitz so bewitching – frankly, we need to be them as a lot as we need to learn them.

‘Didion & Babitz’ by Lili Anolik (Atlantic Books, £20) is out now

Obtainable on Apple Books