Hearing regarding CM Kejriwal also held in Delhi High Court
New Delhi:
A PIL (Public Interest Litigation) was filed in the Delhi High Court demanding the removal of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who is in ED remand in the Delhi Liquor Policy case. While hearing this petition, the High Court has rejected it. During the hearing on this petition, the court asked the petitioner's lawyer whether there is any legal prohibition in this? The court also said that judicial intervention is not necessary in this. If there is any constitutional failure then the LG will look into it. The President will take a decision on their recommendation.
“This issue is not such that the court should give orders on it.”
Read also
The court further said that we have also read the statement of LG of Delhi in the newspapers. We know that this matter is in his notice. For now, let them handle this matter. The court does not give orders to impose President's rule. We are not commenting on the allegations made in the petition. But this issue is not such that the court should give orders on it.
It is noteworthy that Kejriwal had issued his second work order from ED custody on Tuesday. Health Minister Saurabh Bhardwaj was instructed to ensure that medicines and testing arrangements are available for the people in all government hospitals and mohalla clinics.
Saxena indirectly targeting the AAP government said, 'As children, we all have heard a saying like 'chewing iron gram'. After coming to Delhi, I really understood the meaning of this saying. Saxena had said that getting any work done in this city feels like 'chewing iron gram'. Whatever you try to do, there are forces that try to stop you from doing it, and if you (somehow) manage to complete it successfully, those forces try to take the credit. Do it.
After Kejriwal's arrest on March 21, Delhi Cabinet Minister Atishi had said that he (Kejriwal) would remain the Chief Minister and if necessary, would run the Delhi government from jail. Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had also said that the party supremo should not be changed. Can go.
