Sports activities Desk, New Delhi. The Indian cricket workforce defeated South Africa within the ultimate of the T20 World Cup-2024. On this match, Staff India batsman Virat Kohli's bat was in full swing. He performed an innings of 76 runs and was adjudged Man of the Match for this innings. However India's former batsman and veteran commentator have raised questions on this. This individual believes that Kohli shouldn’t have obtained this award.
Kohli's bat remained silent all through the World Cup. However within the ultimate, Kohli's bat shone and he performed such an innings that took Staff India to a robust rating. Attributable to this, Kohli was chosen because the Participant of the Match. Nonetheless, Sanjay Manjrekar feels that Kohli didn’t deserve it.
Additionally read- India Tour of Zim: Why did Shubman Gill not go to Zimbabwe with Staff India, the place is that this batsman, the massive reality got here out
Strike charge was low
Chatting with ESPNcricinfo, Manjrekar mentioned that Kohli's innings was gradual resulting from which Hardik Pandya received to play fewer balls. Manjrekar mentioned, “Due to that innings, Hardik Pandya, who was their most harmful batsman, received an opportunity to play solely two balls. So I believe the Indian batting was good however Virat Kohli performed such an innings that put India in a nook and everybody noticed this, in the long run the bowlers saved us.”
The bowler ought to have gotten the award
Manjrekar mentioned that if the bowlers had not bowled properly within the dying overs, India would have misplaced and that’s the reason he mentioned {that a} bowler ought to have been chosen because the Man of the Match. He mentioned, “The Indian workforce was dropping. South Africa had a 90 % probability of profitable. However then the tables turned and Virat Kohli's innings was saved. My Man of the Match would have been a bowler as a result of he introduced victory from the jaws of defeat and made India the winner.”
Additionally read- 1 telephone name stopped Dravid, in any other case Rahul would have left in November itself, he himself informed the reality
